What Evidence Exists Regarding the Effects of Gender-affirming Surgery on Mental Health, Patient Satisfaction, and Detransition?
Question
What evidence exists regarding the effects of gender-affirming surgery on mental health, patient satisfaction, and detransition?
Answer
Extensive evidence shows that gender-affirming surgery significantly reduces gender dysphoria and improves mental health outcomes for transgender and gender-diverse individuals. While the surgery is specifically a treatment for gender dysphoria and not for general mental health conditions, improvements are often seen in anxiety, depression, suicide attempt rates, quality of life, life satisfaction, and overall happiness following the procedure. Higher patient satisfaction is frequently associated with supportive perioperative interactions and assessments, which help clarify patient goals and expectations. Conversely, dissatisfaction tends to correlate with surgical complications, poor aesthetic or functional outcomes, and the absence of desired physical sensations, particularly following complex procedures like vaginoplasty or phalloplasty.
Regarding detransition, studies have shown that regret following gender-affirming surgery is very rare. In a review involving 7,928 transgender individuals, the pooled prevalence of regret was found to be less than 1%, with only 77 individuals expressing regret. Another study encompassing 17,151 participants looked more broadly at gender affirmation, including surgeries, hormone therapies, and social transitions, and reported a 13% history of detransition. However, detransition often resulted from external pressures, such as family rejection, societal stigma, or personal safety concerns, rather than internal uncertainty. It is crucial to recognize that detransition does not necessarily equate to regret over having undergone surgery.
This Ask the Expert is an edited excerpt from the course, ‘Gender Affirming Surgery for Adults: Conducting Readiness Evaluations,’ presented by Giselle Levin, PsyD
Giselle Levin
PsyD
Related Courses
Fundamentals and Ethical Considerations of Clinical Practice with LGBT Populations: Assessment and Therapy Guidelines
Effective clinical practice with LGBT populations requires a basic understanding of LGBT concepts and terms, presenting problems, and evidence-based interventions. This workshop describes the fundamentals for assessment and therapy with LGBT patients through a discussion of best practices, language use guidelines, and ethical considerations. The workshop explores the concepts of sex, sexuality, and gender and defines common terms used to describe LGBT identities. Health disparities, co-occurring mental health problems, and presenting clinical concerns among LGBT populations are explored through the lens of Minority Stress Theory. Finally, ethical considerations for confidentiality, informed consent, and evidence-based therapy practice are discussed.Conducting Gender-Affirming Hormone Evaluations for Adults Using the Informed Consent Model
Gender-affirming care including hormones and surgery are evidence-based treatments that reduce gender dysphoria in transgender and gender non-conforming people, but many face barriers accessing this care. Clinicians need training on appropriately diagnosing gender dysphoria, assessing readiness for hormones per WPATH guidelines, and managing comorbid psychiatric conditions. This course provides comprehensive information and practice guidelines for providing gender-affirming hormone therapy to transgender adults.Culturally Competent Clinical Care and Ethics: BDSM, Kink, and Fetishes in Practice
Working with patients involved in BDSM and kink can seem daunting for many clinicians. This course introduces clinicians to the principles and practices of BDSM and kink, with an emphasis on ethics, safety, and consent. Clinicians will learn to appropriately assess risk, navigate bias and stigma, and employ interventions to support and affirm BDSM, kink, and fetishes.