How Should Clinicians Approach Their Duty to Report When Working with High-conflict Families Where Allegations May be Strategically Motivated?
Question
How should clinicians approach their duty to report when working with high-conflict families where allegations may be strategically motivated?
Answer
Clinicians working with high-conflict families must recognize that their ethical and legal duty to report suspected abuse or neglect remains unchanged, regardless of the family dynamics at play. Even in cases where allegations appear to be part of a pattern of conflict between parents, the threshold for reporting remains unchanged; if there is suspicion, the obligation to report remains.
That said, clinicians may have the opportunity to provide contextual information alongside a report when it is clinically relevant. For example, a clinician may note that the family presents with a high-conflict dynamic and a history of allegations, while still fulfilling their reporting duty. This added context does not override the report, but it can offer important framing for those receiving it.
Clinicians must also remain vigilant about their own potential biases in these situations. When only one parent is present in treatment, such as when a mother is the consistent point of contact, there is a natural risk of developing a skewed perception of the family system. Actively working against that bias is an essential part of ethical, balanced clinical practice in high-conflict cases.
This Ask the Expert is an edited excerpt from the course, "Navigating High-Conflict Co-Parenting: Ethics and Strategies," presented by Karalynn Royster, PsyD.
Karalynn Royster
PsyD
Related Courses
Parent-Child Relationship Assessments: A Review of Ethical Considerations and Assessment Tool Selection
This course supports participants' knowledge in familiarizing and ascertaining practical skills to conduct parent-child relationship evaluations and screening using a blend of informal and formal assessment tools. This knowledge will further empower participants to contribute effectively to the well-being of children, facilitate treatment planning using the dynamics of parent-child relationships, and review ethical considerations for assessing this population. This course focuses on early and middle childhood.Neurodivergent Children in Two Homes: Clinical, Ethical, and Systems Considerations in Co-Parenting
This course addresses the unique vulnerabilities of neurodivergent children navigating the complexities of two-home family systems. Participants will explore developmentally informed, neurodiversity-affirming interventions designed to support emotional regulation, attachment, and overall functioning within co-parenting dynamics, with a specific focus on high-conflict cases. The curriculum also provides strategies for clinicians to maintain professional boundaries, effectively avoiding triangulation and associated ethical pitfalls. This course equips practitioners with the specialized tools necessary to facilitate stability for neurodivergent youth across multiple environments.Working with Transgender and Gender Diverse Youth: Navigating the Current Political Climate, Clinical Practice Guidelines, and Ethical Considerations
With increased anti-trans legislation directed toward transgender and gender-diverse youth, it is especially imperative that mental health providers support this vulnerable population. This course describes current research on transgender and gender-diverse youth and describes WPATH standards for gender-affirming care of youth. The course provides clinical guidelines with an emphasis on helping transgender and gender-diverse youth manage stressors associated with the current political climate. Last, the course investigates ethical considerations when working with trans and gender-diverse youth.