Course Articles
The Sociology of Child Abuse & Evidence-Based Prevention
Sophie Nathenson, PhD
Course overview
This article develops a sociological perspective on child abuse and neglect, shifting the frame of analysis from the individual to the societal level. It examines how culture, norms, technology, economics, social relations, and policy shape the prevalence and distribution of child maltreatment across populations. The discussion moves from foundational definitions of abuse and neglect, through mandatory reporting obligations for health and behavioral health professionals, national and state-level trends and statistics, and an ecological model that situates individual and family risk within broader social conditions, before turning to evidence-informed prevention strategies at the policy, community, and practice levels. The material is intended for health, behavioral health, and social service professionals who want to integrate a population-level, contextual understanding of child maltreatment into direct practice with individuals and families. As structured, the activity is designed to occupy approximately one hour of independent study time, consistent with a single continuing education contact hour.
Course information
Limitations/Risks
- This presentation does not cover the entirety of research, statistics, or variation in types and prevalence of child abuse
- All research is at the population level and should not be applied to all groups or individuals as a whole
- Research seeking to explain the motivation and function of child abuse should not be interpreted as condoning behavior
- Research on social factors should not be interpreted as obscuring personal responsibility and individual choice
- All research is at the population level and should not be applied to all groups or individuals as a whole.
Learning Outcomes
After this course, participants will be able to:
- Explain the Child Abuse and Neglect Reporting Act as it relates to your professional role.
- Identify four community-level factors in child abuse and neglect.
- Describe two evidence-based approaches to preventing child abuse in communities.
Introduction
The Sociological Perspective
Sociology, like psychology, economics, political science, and anthropology, is a discipline concerned with human behavior. What distinguishes the sociological perspective is its unit of analysis. Rather than asking what makes a particular individual behave in a particular way, sociology examines rates of behavior and compares outcomes across groups, looking for patterns that suggest something about a group, a location, or a social experience that may be influencing the behavior in question, rather than something occurring to only a few isolated individuals.
That societal lens applies directly to child abuse and neglect. Any measurable characteristic of how a society functions can be examined for its relationship to social problems, including culture, which the United States contains many overlapping forms of. Norms are the expected ways of behaving within a given community. Technology represents a substantial influence on society as a whole, and the nature and pace of technological change differ from one society to another. Economic structure, including how an economy is organized and how resources are distributed, has effects that trickle down to shape individual lives. Social relations rank among the most significant influences on mental health, and policy, meaning laws and the workings of social institutions such as the healthcare system, the educational system, and the criminal justice system, represent another layer through which society shapes individual outcomes.
Most clinical, behavioral health, and social work training curricula focus heavily on preparing practitioners to work directly with individuals, leaving comparatively little curricular space for analyzing the social factors and environmental conditions that shape a client's life circumstances. Bringing a population-level, big-picture perspective to frontline practitioners is not offered here as a replacement for individual clinical skill, but as a complementary lens that can be folded into direct practice with clients and families, since the institutional and structural pieces of society, including the healthcare, education, and criminal justice systems, are what allow sociology to complement, rather than replace, the individually focused work done in psychology, social work, and other helping professions. That framing recurs throughout the sections that follow, each of which takes a phenomenon often understood primarily as an individual failing or an individual pathology and asks what group-level, environmental, or structural conditions might also be contributing to it.
This dual focus matters because clinical training and sociological training tend to answer different questions. A clinician trained to work one-on-one with a client is well equipped to ask what is happening for this particular person, in this particular family, at this particular moment. A sociologist is better equipped to ask why rates of a given outcome differ across neighborhoods, states, or demographic groups, and what that difference might reveal about shared conditions rather than shared personality traits. Neither question subsumes the other. A practitioner who can hold both questions at once, treating the individual in front of them with clinical attention while also recognizing the community-level patterns that individual's circumstances reflect, is in a stronger position to identify appropriate referrals, anticipate systemic barriers, and avoid mistaking a structural problem for a personal one.
Child Maltreatment
Child maltreatment is generally categorized into several forms, including physical abuse, emotional abuse, sexual abuse, neglect, and exposure to violence. Childhood emotional maltreatment (CEM) is defined as not receiving love and support, and may also involve verbal assault or demeaning treatment, such as being repeatedly called names (Massullo et al., 2023; Finkelhor et al., 2023). This category of abuse carries long-term effects comparable to those associated with physical or sexual abuse.
General neglect is defined as the failure to provide basic needs, including food, shelter, water, and medical care (Massullo et al., 2023; Finkelhor et al., 2023). A sense of belonging and community is also part of what a child requires to be well in society, although the formal definition of general neglect used in most research and policy contexts is limited to the basic survival needs listed above. A recurring theme in the literature is that most research attention is directed toward sexual abuse and fatal abuse, even though neglect is statistically the most common form of maltreatment affecting children (Massullo et al., 2023; Finkelhor et al., 2023).
Impact of Abuse on Wellbeing
Childhood maltreatment is associated with a wide range of adverse outcomes across the lifespan. On the physical health side, documented associations include diabetes, lung disease, vision problems, poor nutrition, sleep problems, and sexual difficulties. On the mental health side, associations include attachment difficulties, impaired executive functioning, posttraumatic stress disorder, depression, anxiety, suicidal ideation or attempts, self-harm, and body image issues (Daníelsdóttir et al., 2024). Some researchers characterize adverse childhood experiences as among the most impactful known contributors to diagnoses listed in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM; Daníelsdóttir et al., 2024).
The adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) framework offers a structured assessment of experiences occurring between birth and age seventeen, including the various forms of child maltreatment described above as well as household exposure to substance use, domestic violence, and mental illness in a caregiver. An accumulation of these experiences is associated with substantially elevated risk of physical, mental, emotional, and social difficulties later in life. That elevated-risk trajectory reflects outcomes observed in the absence of intervention, and it is longitudinal research comparing groups with differing levels of childhood adversity that first allows the pattern to be identified at the population level. Impaired executive functioning is of particular interest because it may also play a role in the intergenerational continuation of abuse, insofar as adults who were themselves maltreated as children may carry functional impairments that affect their own parenting.
Impact on Youth Social Life
Childhood maltreatment also affects children's social functioning and relationships, including social cognition, emotional regulation, and sense of belonging. Research indicates that any type of maltreatment negatively affects sociality, popularity (measured by asking peers to name their friends), and social cohesion, while physical neglect specifically was found to affect all of these outcomes (Kamis & Copeland, 2024). In the sample referenced, more than 28 percent of children had experienced physical abuse, more than 4 percent had experienced sexual abuse, more than 17 percent had experienced emotional abuse, and more than 10 percent had experienced physical neglect (Kamis & Copeland, 2024).
These findings connect naturally to the concept of trauma-informed care: children experiencing abuse at home do not necessarily experience school as a place of reprieve, since the effects of maltreatment on emotional regulation and social functioning tend to follow a child into other settings. When children carrying these difficulties display behavioral or regulatory challenges at school, awareness of trauma-informed approaches can shift how educators and other professionals interpret and respond to that behavior. Trauma-informed care, as a practice framework, is not addressed in depth here, but the relationship flagged above warrants further professional development on its own terms.
Mandatory Reporting
Role of Health Professionals
Health professionals are mandatory reporters of suspected or confirmed child abuse. Social workers and behavioral health professionals, in particular, work with vulnerable populations, a term referring to groups that, compared with other groups in society, systematically have less access to resources, may be treated differently, or may experience a different life course that affects their ability to meet basic needs and maintain mental and emotional health. The existence of the social work profession reflects a societal response to these disparities, distributing support services to populations that need them, including children and individuals experiencing abuse.
Cultural competency, often required for professional licensure, follows naturally from this point. Cultural competency training has not been shown to have a large direct effect on patient outcomes on its own, in part because outcomes are also shaped by the structural and economic issues taken up later in this article. Cultural competency does not require a practitioner to become an expert on every culture encountered, nor does it require adopting the beliefs, practices, or attitudes of a given cultural group. Rather, it means recognizing that group and individual differences exist, avoiding assumptions, remaining open-minded, and making an effort to understand a client's context. That awareness can strengthen the therapeutic alliance between a practitioner and the people served, regardless of whether the practitioner shares the client's cultural background.
Child Abuse Reporting Act
Child abuse and neglect reporting requirements vary by state law. The general purpose of these statutes is to protect children from harm, and they require covered professionals to report suspected or confirmed cases of child abuse, whether encountered at work or outside of work. Reporting is required upon reasonable suspicion; a mandated reporter need not have witnessed the abuse directly or confirmed that it occurred before making a report.
Penalties for failing to report vary by state. As an illustrative example, the penalty in California for a mandated reporter who fails to report suspected abuse is up to six months of confinement in a county jail, a fine of up to $1,000, or both. Reporting laws of this kind are designed to place "eyes" on children across a wide range of settings by requiring a broad group of professionals who come into regular, close contact with children to receive training in recognizing and reporting suspected abuse. Worth noting as an editorial aside, not tied to a specific citation: certain settings associated with elevated abuse risk, such as some workplaces connected to trafficking, and certain professional roles that also work closely with youth outside of the categories below, are not explicitly named as covered professions, even though contact with children in those settings can be substantial.
Covered professionals
The category of mandated reporters is broad and includes the following groups, as identified on the accompanying slide:
- Physicians, dentists, medical residents or interns, hospital personnel and administrators, nurses, health care practitioners, chiropractors, osteopaths, pharmacists, optometrists, podiatrists, emergency medical technicians, ambulance drivers, undertakers, coroners, medical examiners, alcohol or drug treatment personnel, and persons performing a healing role or practicing the healing arts
- Psychologists, psychiatrists, and mental health professionals
- Social workers, and licensed or unlicensed marriage, family, and individual counselors
- Teachers, teacher's aides or assistants, school counselors and guidance personnel, school officials, and school administrators
- Child care workers and administrators
- Law enforcement personnel, probation officers, criminal prosecutors, and juvenile rehabilitation or detention facility employees
- Foster parents
- Commercial film and photo processors
Awareness of and training on suspected abuse indicators among frontline professionals, such as physicians and teachers, is a recognized element of early identification systems (Röders et al., 2024).
Trends & Variation
Stats
National data provide a sense of the scale of child abuse and neglect in the United States. In the most recent reporting year discussed on the slides, more than 3,081,715 children received some form of child protective services response, at a rate of approximately 7.4 children per 1,000, with the highest rate among children younger than 1 year of age. There were 546,159 confirmed victims of child abuse and neglect, of whom 64 percent experienced neglect only. Approximately 2,000 children died as a result of abuse or neglect in that year, and there were 422,117 identified perpetrators, an increase of nearly 20 percent compared with 2019. Approximately one in four cases involved a substance use factor, and approximately one in four involved a domestic violence factor. More than 1.76 million children received prevention services during the year. The overall prevalence of child abuse and neglect has not meaningfully decreased since the mid-1990s, despite increased investment in prevention efforts and expanded child protective services capacity.
The following table reproduces the core national statistics presented on the slide.
Measure Value Children with a child protective services response 3,081,715 Rate per 1,000 children 7.4 Confirmed victims of abuse and neglect 546,159 Share of victims who experienced neglect only 64% Child fatalities 2,000 Identified perpetrators 422,117 Increase in perpetrators since 2019 ~20% Cases with a substance use factor 25% Cases with a domestic violence factor 25% Children receiving prevention services 1,762,516 These figures likely underrepresent true prevalence, since many cases never come to the attention of any reporting authority, particularly when a child who is being controlled or coached by an abuser does not feel able to disclose what is happening.
State Differences
Reported rates of child abuse and neglect vary considerably by state. Massachusetts has the highest reported rate, at 16.5 per 100,000 (22,075 cases), followed by West Virginia, Iowa, Maine, and Alaska. New Jersey has the lowest reported rate, at 1.6 (3,146 cases), preceded by Pennsylvania, Washington, Virginia, and Kansas. Measured by raw number of cases rather than rate, Texas has the highest count, at 54,207, while Vermont has the lowest, at 672.
Several explanations account for this variation. States may define, count, and report child abuse differently, which limits the direct comparability of raw statistics across jurisdictions. Better-funded child protective services systems may also identify and record more cases simply because they have greater capacity to do so, meaning that a higher reported rate in a well-resourced state does not necessarily indicate a higher true prevalence of abuse. Legal treatment of practices such as corporal punishment also differs by state; in some states, including Oklahoma, corporal punishment such as spanking or slapping is treated as a matter of parental discretion unless it crosses into an excessive or injurious level, which is itself a subjective threshold.
Beyond definitional and administrative differences, sociological factors identified in connection with state and community "hotspots" of child abuse include housing instability, a lower volume of available services, unemployment, and substance abuse, particularly involving opioids and methamphetamine.
Digging Deeper
Self-report surveys that ask children directly about their own experiences provide an additional, and in some respects more complete, picture than administrative case data. According to national surveys of children's exposure to violence, 38.1 percent of children had experienced some form of maltreatment by age 17, with some sources placing the figure as high as half of all children. Of this experienced maltreatment, approximately 75 percent was neglect, 17 percent was physical abuse, 11 percent was sexual abuse, 4 to 7 percent was emotional abuse, and 0.2 percent involved trafficking.
Data drawn from the DHHS National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System for 2023 indicate that 90 percent of sexual abusers are known to the child, that one in four girls and one in twenty boys will experience sexual abuse in their lifetime, that 10.6 percent of children experience physical abuse only, that 7.5 percent experience sexual abuse only, and that 3.5 percent experience psychological maltreatment only.
The statistic that the large majority of sexual abusers are known to the child is sociologically significant on its own terms. Media coverage of child sexual abuse often emphasizes cases involving strangers or abduction, which are important but comparatively rare relative to abuse committed by someone already trusted by the child or the child's family, such as a relative, babysitter, or teacher. That pattern suggests that prevention efforts benefit from attention to family and other trusted relationship systems, in addition to stranger-danger messaging, even though this focus can feel uncomfortable or counterintuitive. Public attention to child abuse tends to concentrate heavily on cases involving a stranger or an abductor, coverage that is important and merited in its own right, but coverage of this kind can create a skewed public impression of where risk actually concentrates, since babysitters, teachers, relatives, and other trusted adults account for the substantial majority of sexual abuse cases.
Taken together, the scope of these figures supports the sociological argument that child abuse should be understood as what the discipline terms a public issue, meaning a problem so widespread that societal or environmental conditions are implicated, rather than solely a personal trouble affecting a small number of individuals. A personal trouble is an individual's private struggle or suffering; a public issue is a pattern that recurs across a large enough share of the population to suggest something happening at the level of the community, institution, or society, rather than only within a small number of disturbed or ill-intentioned individuals. That shift, from viewing child abuse as a personal trouble to viewing it as a public issue, is the central conceptual move underlying the analysis that follows, since it is this shift that justifies looking to community, economic, and cultural conditions, rather than exclusively to individual psychology, for both explanation and prevention.
Introduction
Ecological Model
The ecological model is a theoretical framework that integrates personal history, family systems, and societal-level factors to explain outcomes such as child abuse perpetration and victimization (Jip et al., 2025). At the individual level, the model considers a person's personal history and individual characteristics, including biological factors. At the family level, it considers the household's dynamics and functioning. At the societal level, it considers the broader social, economic, and cultural conditions in which individuals and families are embedded.
Effective prevention, under this framework, depends on a holistic and contextual understanding of a case or a population, rather than an exclusive focus on any single level of analysis (Jip et al., 2025). Existing research and intervention efforts tend to carry a bias toward individual risk factors, which can obscure the societal conditions that also underlie abuse rates (Jip et al., 2025). Socioeconomic conditions, cultural norms, and broader social problems contribute in layered ways to abuse rates (Jip et al., 2025). Consider a town whose economy depends heavily on a single large employer: when that employer closes or substantially reduces its workforce, subsequent community-level increases in substance use, depression, and anxiety can be observed, illustrating how an event affecting an entire community can raise risk across many individuals simultaneously, distinct from any one person's individual psychology.
Social Determinants
Individual/Psychopathological
At the individual level, mental health factors specific to a given person do not reliably predict whether that person will perpetrate abuse, and such factors are not generalizable to populations as a whole. Personality disorders, severe substance use, impulse-control difficulties, impaired cognitive functioning, low self-esteem, and needs related to power and control are among the individual-level factors that can contribute to the perpetration of abuse. Psychosocial comorbidities can also increase a child's risk of victimization. Carrying any of these individual risk factors does not mean that abuse will occur; these are population-level associations rather than deterministic predictions about any one person.
The sociological approach builds on this individual-level picture by analyzing the social conditions that can influence these same risk factors, effectively asking what is happening in a person's environment that may be shaping the individual vulnerabilities described above, rather than treating those vulnerabilities as freestanding or unexplained.
Focusing on Society
Reframed at the societal level, child abuse is best understood as a public health issue rather than solely an individual problem (Korbin, 1994; Luo et al., 2025). This framing is analogous to how public health has approached other large-scale problems, such as the opioid crisis or the COVID-19 pandemic, in which the effects extend well beyond any single affected individual, influencing healthcare costs, education costs, and social services spending across a population.
Addressing upstream factors, meaning the social and economic conditions that precede a crisis event such as a fatality, injury, or confirmed abuse case, is the most impactful point of intervention, since it affects the largest number of people before harm occurs, in contrast to downstream responses such as emergency services, removal of a child from the home, or punishment of a perpetrator after the fact. Individual development takes place within families, neighborhoods, and the broader sociocultural environment, meaning that all of these settings shape a child's outcomes, not the family alone (Korbin, 1994; Luo et al., 2025).
Social Factors
Social Factors
Certain social statuses are associated with increased risk of child maltreatment, including low socioeconomic status, low educational attainment, young parental age, single parenthood, having multiple dependent children, and low income (Hong et al., 2023; Nadan, Spilsbury, & Korbin, 2015). A social gradient is observed across these factors, meaning that differences in income, race, ethnicity, and LGBTQ+ status are all associated with differing levels of risk (Hong et al., 2023; Nadan, Spilsbury, & Korbin, 2015). Lower social status is associated with chronic stress arising from external conditions and unmet basic needs (Hong et al., 2023; Nadan, Spilsbury, & Korbin, 2015).
These comparisons are made at the group level and do not imply that individuals sharing a given social status are alike in other respects, nor that any one person in a higher-risk category will necessarily experience or perpetrate abuse. Rather, the purpose of identifying these statistically elevated-risk categories is to direct attention toward the structural conditions, such as educational access or income support, that may underlie the observed differences, rather than toward the individuals themselves.
Race & Social Statuses
Research on race and child abuse identification produces mixed results. Some studies find that Black and Hispanic children are overrepresented in the child welfare system and in hospitalization for abuse-related injury, indicating greater risk of family separation and higher associated healthcare costs (Salimi-Jazi et al., 2024). When socioeconomic status and other relevant variables are statistically controlled for, Black race continues to show an independent effect on these outcomes, while Hispanic ethnicity appears to serve as a buffer, a pattern attributable in part to cultural factors (Salimi-Jazi et al., 2024).
Assumptions made by reporters, clinicians, or other professionals about families from non-dominant racial or ethnic groups can themselves contribute to higher rates of reporting, independent of any underlying difference in the true prevalence of abuse. The concept of intersectionality, referring to the co-occurrence of multiple social statuses such as race, class, gender, and sexuality, is also relevant, since overlapping statuses can compound vulnerability to abuse and affect a family's access to protective resources.
Community Factors
A set of evidence-based community-level factors has been identified in research examining why some communities show markedly higher rates of child abuse than others (Sampson, Raudenbush, & Earls, 1997). These factors include the level of violence and crime in a community, the number of mandated reporters present, the availability of social support services, the concentration of children relative to adults (a higher concentration is linked to higher rates of abuse), low food access, social cohesion and integration, neighborhood disadvantage, and residential instability (Sampson, Raudenbush, & Earls, 1997). The overall level of social support available in a community, including help with childcare and positive role modeling, also affects maltreatment rates (Sampson, Raudenbush, & Earls, 1997).
Neighborhood disadvantage often follows a self-reinforcing pattern: higher crime and reduced business investment can lead to declining property values and lower property tax revenue, which in turn reduces funding available for local education and other public services, further compounding disadvantage over time. Because property tax revenue in most jurisdictions funds schools directly, this cycle also touches the concentration of mandated reporters described above, since schools and school-based staff are among the settings where sustained daily contact with children makes early identification of abuse most feasible; a neighborhood losing school funding is, in effect, also losing some of its reporting infrastructure at the same time that its other risk factors are increasing.
Culture: Norms & Socialization
Culture encompasses a society's beliefs, values, and norms, meaning its expected ways of behaving, and socialization is the process through which individuals learn to behave and express themselves within their given culture. Norms surrounding corporal punishment, gender roles, and stigma or silence around disclosure all affect both the prevalence and the reporting of abuse. State-level differences in the legal and normative treatment of corporal punishment, discussed above, illustrate how cultural norms shape what is considered acceptable parenting versus abuse.
Collectivist and individualist societies may differ in reporting patterns. The United States is generally described as an individualist society, whereas other societies or subgroups may be more collectivist. A collectivist orientation can serve as a protective buffer through greater social cohesion, but it may also be associated with lower reporting rates, as community reputation can create pressure against disclosure. Victim blaming, in which the person harmed is held responsible for the abuse, is also a cultural phenomenon, and abuse can become internalized by victims as a result.
Early Development & Abuse
Emotional bonds and attachment patterns formed early in life can increase the likelihood that a person will later perpetrate abuse, and low empathy and emotional awareness can impair a caregiver's ability to respond appropriately to a child's emotional needs. This perspective frames abuse as shaped, at least in part, by skill deficits or developmental gaps rather than exclusively as a product of deliberate ill intent.
That framing is offered as one lens among several, not as an excuse for abusive behavior. Consider a mother with attachment-related deficits, co-occurring substance use difficulties, and shame following the removal of her child: a skills-and-deficits framework applied to a case of this kind can identify additional points for intervention, such as building emotional regulation and parenting skills, without minimizing the seriousness or impact of the abuse itself.
Economic Drivers
Economic inequality, as distinct from the overall size or growth rate of an economy, is a major predictor of social problems generally, because it influences stress, social status, social trust, and the distribution of resources. Poverty and unemployment can lead to chronic stress, substance use, and erosion of mental and cognitive functioning, while housing instability and food insecurity directly undermine a family's ability to meet a child's basic needs. Poverty is one of the most consistently identified risk factors for child abuse and neglect in the broader research literature (Bywaters et al., 2022), and periods of economic insecurity have a documented temporal relationship with subsequent child maltreatment (Conrad-Hiebner & Byram, 2020).
Consider a parent facing simultaneous stressors, such as unemployment, housing precarity, and food insecurity: accumulated pressures of this kind can erode a parent's capacity to manage a child's ordinary behavioral challenges, without in any way excusing resulting harm. These economic conditions are best understood as contributing factors layered atop other individual and social factors, consistent with the ecological model discussed above. Human children have an unusually long period of developmental dependency compared with most other species, requiring near-constant care during infancy and early childhood; that extended dependency period helps explain why economic and housing instability during a child's earliest years carries disproportionate weight for outcomes such as neglect, and why the highest reported rates of child abuse and neglect response occur among children younger than one year of age, as noted in the Stats section above.
Social Isolation
Social isolation is one of the most significant risk factors affecting health and mortality outcomes generally, with some research suggesting its effect on premature death is comparable to or greater than that of heavy smoking, active alcohol use disorder, or a sedentary lifestyle. Weak social ties and disconnection from the community are associated with increased risk of perpetrating child abuse.
Societal disruptions such as the COVID-19 pandemic intensified social isolation and economic stress simultaneously. A study conducted only two weeks after the onset of the pandemic found that one in five adults in a broadly distributed sample had hit their child, with employment loss and isolation identified as risk factors net of other variables such as depression, income, and demographic characteristics (Lee, Ward, Lee, & Rodriguez, 2022). Perceived isolation, meaning an individual's own sense of being isolated, was also associated with changes in disciplinary behavior, including increased spanking and hitting, even among parents who reported that they would not otherwise have used these behaviors (Lee, Ward, Lee, & Rodriguez, 2022). Investigations conducted in specific jurisdictions during the pandemic period similarly documented shifts in the volume and pattern of child maltreatment investigations coinciding with pandemic-related disruption (Zhang, 2023).
Social Media & Technology
Image-based sexual abuse (IBSA) refers to harm caused through the creation, distribution, or misuse of explicit images, and is more commonly reported among sexual minority youth (Mitchell et al., 2025). More broadly, media content can normalize violence and exploitation, and experiencing abuse increases the likelihood of problematic social media use as well as body image dissatisfaction (Kircaburun, Griffiths, & Billieux, 2020). Problematic social media use associated with childhood maltreatment has also been linked to attachment difficulties and depression (Worsley et al., 2018).
Independent of other forms of sexual abuse or adversity, experiencing image-based sexual abuse specifically increases the odds of drug overdose, suicide attempt, and self-injury among affected youth (Mitchell et al., 2025). This area of risk receives comparatively little attention in standard psychology and social work curricula, despite its documented impact, and it warrants the same practitioner attention given to more traditional categories of abuse.
Prevention
Prevention: Policy
At the policy level, several categories of intervention are identified as evidence-relevant approaches to reducing child abuse and neglect. These include universal health care, the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC), Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), and Department of Housing and Urban Development Community Development Block Grant funding that supports low-rent, stable housing in low-poverty areas. Additional systems-level change involves child welfare systems engaging more directly with income, employment, and housing conditions rather than operating in isolation from other social service systems. Reviews of potential structural solutions to reducing rates of child abuse and neglect similarly point toward income- and housing-focused policy levers as high-value targets for intervention (Heil, 2025).
Policies that improve family socioeconomic status have the greatest health impact on children because they increase a family's ability to meet basic needs and improve overall well-being. Many of the relevant systems, such as education, welfare, and criminal justice, tend to operate with limited coordination or communication, even though none of the underlying problems can be fully addressed within a single institutional silo.
This siloing has practical consequences for how prevention is funded and evaluated. A housing program and a child welfare program may each be judged by outcomes specific to their own mandate, housing stability on one hand and confirmed maltreatment cases on the other, without either program's evaluation capturing the interaction between the two. Yet the research summarized above suggests that the two are causally linked: stable housing reduces the chronic stress and instability associated with neglect, and a child welfare system that engages proactively with a family's housing and income situation is addressing a root cause rather than only a downstream symptom. Structural reviews of this problem point to the same conclusion: policy levers targeting income and housing consistently outperform narrowly targeted, abuse-specific interventions when measured by population-level impact (Heil, 2025).
Prevention: Community
At the community level, nurse family partnership programs are close to the gold standard among evidence-based interventions with a demonstrated impact on family outcomes (Levey et al., 2017). These programs typically involve home visitation, in which a nurse or trained case manager visits a family, often beginning before a child is born, and brings resources and support directly into the home. This model removes many practical barriers to service access, including transportation, comfort with clinical settings, and professionals' limited direct knowledge of home conditions, by bringing the intervention to the family rather than requiring the family to seek it out.
Additional community-level strategies include neighborhood representative groups and meetings focused on programs such as foster care, community organizing efforts that share information and resources directly among residents, and a broad range of support services, including parenting classes, mentoring, childcare, and healthcare support (Levey et al., 2017). Communities with high rates of child abuse often also have a low density of these support services, which reinforces the importance of considering service availability alongside other risk factors when planning prevention efforts.
Awareness & Advocacy
Awareness and advocacy strategies include media campaigns, integration of relevant content into school curricula, early childhood interventions such as preschool programming, and inclusion of child abuse as a topic in political and national news coverage, including coverage that uses individual cases to illustrate systemic problems. A further strategy involves explicitly linking the public issue of child abuse to economic, social, and healthcare policy discussions, since media coverage of child abuse is heavily weighted toward sexual abuse and trafficking, important topics in their own right, while economic and structural contributors to abuse receive comparatively little attention in public discourse.
Practice Applications
For professionals working directly with individuals and families, this material translates into several practical applications. These include looking beyond the individual to gain a fuller understanding of the motivations and context behind a case, identifying community resources that can help parents meet their children's basic needs, and attending to skills, emotional intelligence, and physiological or psychological impairments that may stem from a caregiver's own history of past abuse.
An open question worth sitting with: when a child is removed from a home following a confirmed or suspected abuse incident, it is often unclear how much support, whether recovery services, economic assistance, or mental health treatment, is subsequently directed toward the parent or caregiver involved, as opposed to resources directed solely toward the child. A parent with a substance use disorder or untreated mental health condition may lose custody following an incident, and in the absence of coordinated support for that parent's own recovery and economic stability, may experience worsening shame, isolation, and hardship that further compounds the underlying difficulties rather than resolving them. This is less an argument for a single fix than for a more coordinated, wraparound approach that considers the needs of the whole family system, including the parent, rather than treating removal of the child as the endpoint of intervention.
Identifying and connecting families to such resources is one of the more direct and achievable applications of this material for practitioners working at the individual and family level. Attending to physiological and psychological impairments that may stem from a caregiver's own history of past abuse expands a practitioner's understanding of a case beyond a simple moral judgment about a parent's fitness, without excusing harmful behavior, by bringing brain-based and skill-based factors explicitly into the clinical picture alongside social and economic context.
Closing Thoughts…
Several summary points follow from the analysis above. Professionals are cautioned against making assumptions about individuals based on group-level social statuses, since population-level research findings do not predict outcomes for any specific person. Social change is needed both in how child abuse is covered publicly and in how prevention efforts are targeted "upstream," toward conditions that precede abuse rather than only toward crisis response after abuse has occurred. Redistribution of resources stands out as an especially high-impact practice for reducing rates of abuse. Finally, perpetrators of abuse have complex, overlapping intentions and motivations, shaped by social, economic, physiological, and psychological factors together, rather than by any single cause.
None of this displaces individual accountability. Recognizing a social pattern behind an individual act is not the same as excusing that act, and the limitations stated at the outset of this article apply with full force here: population-level findings describe groups, not any single perpetrator's culpability, and a sociological account of why abuse clusters in certain conditions is a tool for prevention, not a defense. Held together, the individual, family, and societal levels of the ecological model give practitioners, policymakers, and researchers a shared vocabulary for locating where an intervention is likely to do the most good, whether that intervention is a single family's treatment plan or a state's housing policy.
Q&A
Questions arising from this material, comments, or requests for collaboration may be directed to info@widespreadwellness.org.
References
Bywaters, P., Skinner, G., Cooper, A., Kennedy, E., & Malik, A. (2022). The relationship between poverty and child abuse and neglect: New evidence. Nuffield Foundation.
Conrad-Hiebner, A., & Byram, E. (2020). The temporal impact of economic insecurity on child maltreatment: A systematic review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 21(1), 157–178.
Daníelsdóttir, H. B., Aspelund, T., Shen, Q., Halldorsdottir, T., Jakobsdóttir, J., Song, H., & Valdimarsdóttir, U. A. (2024). Adverse childhood experiences and adult mental health outcomes. JAMA Psychiatry, 81(6), 586–594.
Finkelhor, D., Turner, H., Colburn, D., Mitchell, K., & Mathews, B. (2023). Child sexual abuse images and youth-produced images: The varieties of image-based sexual exploitation and abuse of children. Child Abuse & Neglect, 143, Article 106269.
Heil, L. C. (2025). Reducing rates of child abuse and neglect: An analysis of three potential solutions. The Mid-Southern Journal of Criminal Justice, 24(1), 2.
Hong, P. K. W., Santana, J. P., Larson, S. D., Berger, A., Mustafa, M. M., Taylor, J. A., & Petroze, R. T. (2023). Structural evaluation of child physical abuse in trauma: Social determinants of health at the population level. Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 58(1), 106–110.
Jip, J. V. G., van Koppen, M. V., Schoonmade, L. L., Vonk, M. J., & Harte, J. M. (2025). What we know about child maltreatment perpetrators: A scoping review of research focus and gaps. Aggression and Violent Behavior, Article 102122.
Kamis, C., & Copeland, M. (2024). Childhood maltreatment associated with adolescent peer networks: Withdrawal, avoidance, and fragmentation. Child Abuse & Neglect, 158, Article 107125.
Kircaburun, K., Griffiths, M. D., & Billieux, J. (2020). Childhood emotional maltreatment and problematic social media use among adolescents: The mediating role of body image dissatisfaction. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 18(6), 1536–1547.
Korbin, J. E. (1994). Sociocultural factors in child maltreatment. In G. B. Melton & F. D. Barry (Eds.), Protecting children from abuse and neglect (pp. 182–223). Guilford Press.
Lee, S. J., Ward, K. P., Lee, J. Y., & Rodriguez, C. M. (2022). Parental social isolation and child maltreatment risk during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Family Violence, 37(5), 813–824.
Levey, E. J., Gelaye, B., Bain, P., Rondon, M. B., Borba, C. P., Henderson, D. C., & Williams, M. A. (2017). A systematic review of randomized controlled trials of interventions designed to decrease child abuse in high-risk families. Child Abuse & Neglect, 65, 48–57.
Luo, Z., Chen, Y., & Epstein, R. A. (2025). Risk factors for child abuse and neglect: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Public Health, 241, 89–98.
Massullo, C., De Rossi, E., Carbone, G. A., et al. (2023). Child maltreatment, abuse, and neglect: An umbrella review of their prevalence and definitions. Clinical Neuropsychiatry, 20(2), 72–99.
Melton, G. B., & Barry, F. D. (Eds.). (1994). Protecting children from abuse and neglect. Guilford Press.
Mitchell, K. J., Colburn, D., Finkelhor, D., Gewirtz-Meydan, A., Turner, H. A., & Jones, L. M. (2025). Links between image-based sexual abuse and mental health in childhood among young adult social media users. Child Abuse & Neglect, 164, Article 107471.
Nadan, Y., Spilsbury, J. C., & Korbin, J. E. (2015). Culture and context in understanding child maltreatment: Contributions of intersectionality and neighborhood-based research. Child Abuse & Neglect, 41, 40–48.
Röders, M., Pauschek, J., Lehbrink, R., Schlicht, L., Jeschke, S., Neininger, M. P., & Bertsche, A. (2024). Early identification and awareness of child abuse and neglect among physicians and teachers. BMC Pediatrics, 24(1), Article 302.
Salimi-Jazi, F., Liang, N. E., Huang, Z., Tennakoon, L., Rafeeqi, T., Trickey, A., & Chao, S. D. (2024). Racial and ethnic disparities in child abuse identification and inpatient treatment. JAMA Network Open, 7(12), e2451588.
Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918–924.
Worsley, J. D., McIntyre, J. C., Bentall, R. P., & Corcoran, R. (2018). Childhood maltreatment and problematic social media use: The role of attachment and depression. Psychiatry Research, 267, 88–93.
Zhang, Y. (2023). COVID-19 impact on child maltreatment: Evidence from abuse and neglect investigations in Texas. In SHS Web of Conferences (Vol. 178, Article 01022). EDP Sciences.
Nov 3, 2026
1 CE CreditElder Abuse and Child Abuse: Know the Signs and Your Role
Kathleen Weissberg, OTR/L, OTD
Editor’s note: This text-based course is a transcript of the webinar, Elder Abuse and Child Abuse: Know the Signs and Your Role, presented by Kathleen Weissberg, OTD, OTR/L.
Learning Outcomes
- After this course, participants will be able to recognize possible clinical, behavioral, and physical indicators of suspected elder and child abuse and neglect.
- After this course, participants will be able to list possible risk factors related to elder and/or child abuse and neglect.
- After this course, participants will be able to describe the reporting procedure for abuse and neglect.
- After this course, participants will be able to list resources that can be utilized for state-specific procedures.
Elder Abuse
Today, we are going to talk about elder abuse and child abuse, and sadly this is more common than you might think. Our goal for today is to learn to spot those warning signs and then to know what your responsibilities are or could possibly be with regard to reporting.
Some Statistics
- According to the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO), elder abuse is a widespread and growing problem
- Data reporting is a challenge
- Recent studies indicate that elder abuse incidence rates are far higher than once thought
According to a study by the United States Government Accountability Office, the GAO, elder abuse is really a widespread and growing problem. The data reporting in this area is a challenge, but despite that, recent studies indicate that elder abuse incident rates are far higher than we probably thought. This slide show includes a few different stories that have come up in the public sector.
- In NYS, incidence rates nearly 24X greater than the number of cases referred to authorities who can help (Lifespan of Greater Rochester et al., 2011)
- One in five Americans older than age 65 had been defrauded (Kiplinger’s Personal Finance, 2011)
- In most cases, the adult children of abused elders were unaware that their mother or father had received solicitations for money (Olson, 2011)
A collaborative public-private report on elder abuse in New York State, for example, found an incident rate of elder abuse nearly 24 times greater than the number of cases referred to social service, law enforcement, or legal authorities who have the capacity and the responsibility to assist adult older victims. And, as a nation, our response is disjointed. The minimal federal investment is only about 12 million dollars, give or take, and it is spread sparsely across eight agencies and two departments with very little coordination. I am going to digress for a second and say that recently the Office of Inspector General came out with a report related to elder abuse. I am not going to go through a lot of the details, but basically they found that a lot of individuals were coming into the emergency room and had diagnosis codes or situations indicative of abuse that was never reported to state authorities. I think we are going to see a little more oversight in the near future on this topic and probably some additional training from some of these government agencies. An Investors Protection Trust Survey found that one in five Americans older than the age of 65 had been defrauded. This is something that we are hearing about quite a bit about in the news. The conservative estimates of the personal cost to victims of financial abuse are easily three billion dollars annually. These reported cases only hint at the extent of the problem. We are not hearing a lot of the other stories that are probably out there. And, in a New York Times article, they talked about financial exploitation and the knowledge of adult children. Many are unaware that their mother or father had even received solicitations for money. Even attentive children, as involved as you can be with your parents, sometimes miss the warning signs. In that particular article, they highlighted the story of Dr. Robert Parker. He is the chief of community geriatrics at the University of Texas Health Medical Center in San Antonio. He failed to notice that his own mother was a victim of financial abuse. So, no matter how involved you are, sometimes you still miss some of these things.
A Chilling Example of Neglect
Before we get into some of the definitions, I wanted to share this story. It was a widely publicized case in Michigan. An elderly female nursing home resident began coughing one night. Her caretakers were busy, and she continued to just cough throughout the night. A couple of staff observed "white things" in her sputum and near her trach collar. It was not until the next morning that somebody actually checked into her mouth, and they found maggots. The maggots had created a partial airway obstruction causing her to suffer abnormal blood oxygen levels and labored breathing. The emergency medical services staff said that they could not even suction because of the very active maggots in the airway. This is just a terrible example and there is no evidence that that staff was disciplined for clearly neglecting this woman so severely.
Definitions
“Acts of omission or commission by a person who stands in a trust relationship that result in harm or threatened harm to the health and/or welfare of an older adult.”
Abuse Defined
- Willful infliction of injury
- Unreasonable confinement/Involuntary seclusion
- Intimidation with resulting physical harm, or pain, or mental anguish
- Punishment with resulting physical harm, or pain, or mental anguish
- Deprivation by an individual, including a caretaker, of goods or services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental, or psychosocial well-being
- Corporal punishment & any physical or chemical restraint not required
- Abuse that includes that which is facilitated or enabled through the use of technology
I think the biggest piece here is that it is willful infliction. It can also include things like unreasonable confinement or involuntary seclusion, and that could happen in the home environment or in an institution. It might be where we are separating an individual from other individuals, from their room, or from another area where they want to go. This can be against their will or even against the will of that person's legal representative. It also could include intimidation or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. It could include things like deprivation by an individual, including a caretaker, of goods or services that are necessary to attain physical, mental, or psychosocial well-being. These are all the things that that person needs to be well. It can include corporal punishment or physical or chemical restraints that are not really required to treat that individual's symptoms or their issues. Again, it is anything that would cause pain or an issue, and it can also include things that are enabled through the use of technology. The individual acts deliberately.
- Elder abuse includes physical, emotional, or sexual harm inflicted upon an older adult, their financial exploitation, or neglect of their welfare by people who are directly responsible for their care
- Elder abuse tends to take place where the senior lives: where their abusers are often adult children, other family members such as grandchildren, or a spouse or partner. Elder abuse can also occur in institutional settings.
Now elder abuse includes, as we just said, physical, emotional, sexual harm potentially inflicted upon an older adult. It can also include financial exploitation and neglect of their welfare. It is done by somebody who is directly responsible for their care. And in the United States alone, more than half a million reports of elder abuse reach authorities every year, and many more go unreported. Now as older adults become more physically frail, they are less able to take care of themselves. They cannot stand up to bullying, and they cannot fight back a lot of times if they are attacked in some way.
The mental or physical ailment that they have can make them more trying to companions for those who live with them. They may not see, hear, or think as clearly as they used to. This leaves them open, unfortunately, for unscrupulous people to take advantage of them, and we definitely see that. The other thing to keep in mind is that elder abuse tends to take place where that individual lives. We hear stories of elder abuse that occurs somewhere out in the community, but typically, the senior lives with their abusers. The abusers can be adult children, other family members like grandchildren, a spouse, a partner, or a very good friend. The sad reality is that elder abuse can also occur in institutional settings especially long-term care facilities, that is where we hear about it most.
Forms of Abuse
- Verbal
- Physical
- Sexual
- Mental/Emotional
- Neglect
- Abandonment
- Financial exploitation
- Self-neglect
What are the different forms? Abuse of elders takes a lot of different forms. Some involve intimidation or threats against the elderly, some involve neglect and other financial trickery. The most common types are listed above. We will go through each one of these in a little more detail and look at some of the warning signs.
Verbal Abuse
- Oral, written or gestured language that includes disparaging and derogatory terms to the residents or their families to describe the resident within their hearing distance, regardless of their age &/or ability to comprehend or disability
This is almost like bullying. It is talking about that person in such a negative way so that they overhear it. The person feels, based upon this blame, diminished self-worth, or diminished ego, et cetera. This is, obviously, not something that we would want to do.
Physical Abuse
- The non-accidental use of force against an elderly person that results in physical pain, injury, or impairment. Such abuse includes not only physical assaults such as hitting or shoving but the inappropriate use of drugs, restraints, or confinement.
Physical abuse is pretty straightforward. This does not just include physical assault such as hitting or shoving, but it can also include things like the inappropriate use of drugs or medications, restraints, or even confinement. This can be in an institutional or home setting. The more common types of physical abuse that we see are things like hitting, slapping, pinching, scratching, spitting, holding that person roughly, holding them in their chair, or forcing them into their wheelchair. It also includes controlling behavior through corporal punishment. Unfortunately, we continue to see this in some of our settings. This a corporal type punishment of influence.
Sexual Abuse
- Contact with an elderly person without their consent. Includes but is not limited to humiliation, harassment, coercion, or sexual assault. Activities such as showing an elderly person pornographic material, forcing the person to watch sex acts, or forcing the elder to undress are also considered sexual elder abuse.
Again, you hear these outrageous stories on the news, and it makes you scratch your head. Sexual abuse includes but is not limited to things like humiliation, harassment, coercion, or even sexual assault. It is non-consensual sexual contact of any type with an individual. It is contact with that elderly person without their consent. It can involve physical sexual acts, but it can also involve other things like showing an elderly person pornographic materials and making them watch it or forcing the person to watch other sex acts or something else occurring in the environment. It can even include forcing the elder to undress in front of you. This would not be part of an ADL or helping them to use the restroom. This is forcing them to undress outside of those normal scenarios.
Emotional/Mental Abuse
- The treatment of an older adult in ways that cause emotional or psychological pain or distress, including:
- Intimidation through yelling or threats
- Humiliation and ridicule
- Habitual blaming or scapegoating
- Ignoring the elderly person
- Isolating an elder from friends or activities
- Terrorizing or menacing the elderly person
- Harassment
- Threats of punishment or deprivation.
This is the treatment of an older adult in ways that cause emotional or psychological pain or distress. It can be intimidation through yelling or threats, humiliation or ridicule, habitual blaming, or scapegoating. It can also be ignoring that elderly person or ignoring their requests, isolating an elder from their friends or their activities, and terrorizing or menacing the elderly person. You may not think that some of these things are necessarily emotional elder abuse, but they could be under the right set of circumstances. For example, if you take a photograph, and that person does not want to be photographed, that could constitute mental, physical, or some sort of abuse. Again, we should not be doing that in any of our settings or doing anything that might be considered humiliating toward an individual. During the delivery of care, depending on what we are doing with that individual, we need to make sure that we are keeping the person from public view like undressing to do an ADL. We need to make sure that we prevent any unnecessary exposure of body parts. That is what we do all the time normally, but if we did not, it could be potentially considered emotional or mental abuse.
My aunt, who has since passed away, was in a nursing home many years ago. She had dementia but she still knew enough to say I need to use the restroom when she truly needed to go. She had a urinary tract infection at the time was going much more frequently. I remember her saying, "I have to use the bathroom." She did not want me to take her and that was fine. She called for a nurse who came in and said, "Don't you realize you just went about an hour ago? You couldn't possibly need to go again. If you need to go, you're just going to have to go in your diaper." And I sat there and thought, "That's emotional abuse. That's humiliating to say to a person." And, this is in a premier community. There are the things that we need to look out for as they can certainly lead to emotional types of abuse. Whether that mental abuse has occurred or not is really determined by a reasonable person's standard and does not require a specific response from the individual. What I mean by that is a reasonable person would think that that is completely unacceptable. It does not necessarily have to have a response from the individual because that individual may have dementia or something else going on and cannot respond in an appropriate manner. We always use that "reasonable person standard" as our litmus test against whether or not something would be considered emotional or mental abuse.
Medication Diversion
- Knowingly, or intentionally, interrupting, obstructing, or altering the delivery, or administration of a prescription drug.
The next one is medication diversion. This is an interesting one. This is one we are hearing more and more about, but I think particularly in a home environment by a companion or caregiver (not necessarily paid) who might be looking to steal those medications for their own personal or financial gain. We are seeing a little bit more of this out in the community.
Elder Neglect
- Failure to provide goods and services necessary to avoid physical harm, mental anguish or mental illness. This constitutes more than half of all reported cases of elder abuse. It can be intentional or unintentional.
This is quite simply the failure to fulfill a caretaking obligation. Unfortunately, this constitutes more than half of all reported cases of elder abuse. It can be intentional or unintentional based on factors such as ignorance or denial that an elderly charge needs as much care as they do. Again, it is really just that failure to provide goods and services that are necessary for that person to avoid harm, and we will talk more about that in just a little bit.
Financial Exploitation
- The unauthorized use of an elderly person’s funds or property, either by a caregiver or an outside scam artist
- Misuse an elder’s personal checks, credit cards, or accounts
- Steal cash, income checks, or household goods
- Forge the elder’s signature
- Engage in identity theft
- Scams targeting the elderly
Another one that we are hearing a lot about now in the news is financial exploitation. This is the unauthorized use of an elderly person's funds or property either by a caregiver or by some outside person, a scam artist. It is deliberate misplacement, exploitation, wrongful temporary or permanent use of an individual's belongings or money without their consent. The important distinction is without their consent. An unscrupulous caregiver might do things like misuse a person's personal checks, their credit cards, or their accounts. They may steal cash, income checks, household goods, or get access to their accounts. They may be under the guise of helping the client with their bills, but they are skimming out of their accounts without that elder knowing. Forging the elder's signature and engaging in identity theft is very common. Another example is an announcement of a prize that the elderly person has won, but they have to pay money to claim. There can be phony charities and investment fraud. I have even heard of scammers showing up on an elder's doorstep. They claim to be from the utility company, or what have you, and they tell the homeowner that they need to pay their bill in cash.
Healthcare Fraud and Abuse
- Not providing healthcare, but charging for it
- Overcharging or double-billing
- Getting kickbacks for referrals
- Overmedicating or under medicating
- Recommending fraudulent remedies for illnesses
- Medicaid fraud
You may not think of this as elder abuse but it really is. This is carried out by unethical individuals like doctors, nurses, hospital personnel, and other professional providers. This includes not providing healthcare but charging for it, overcharging or double-billing from medical care or services, getting kickbacks for referrals to other providers, prescribing certain drugs, over-medicating or under-medicating, or recommending fraudulent remedies for illnesses or other medical conditions. This is anything that benefits the medical professional, not the client.
Elder Self-Neglect
- Physical or mental impairment or diminished capacity can mean that an older adult is no longer able to perform essential self-care
- May lack basic personal hygiene, appear malnourished, live in dirty conditions, be unable to pay bills or manage medications
- Can be a sign of depression, grief, dementia, or other medical problem
We already talked about neglect, but this is self-neglect. This is a common form of elder abuse that we see in healthcare. Physical or mental impairment or diminished capacity can mean that an older individual is no longer able to perform essential self-care, and we see that very commonly with cognitive decline, dementia, et cetera. They may lack basic personal hygiene, appear dehydrated, malnourished, underweight, or what have you. This can be a sign of depression, grief, dementia, some other medical problem, and in many cases, the older person refuses to seek assistance. They, oftentimes, are in denial. They feel ashamed about needing help or feel worried about losing their independence. If you see this self-neglect, this could be indicative of some other larger systemic issue going on with the elder.
Signs of elder abuse can, unfortunately, be very difficult to recognize, mistaken for symptoms of dementia, the elder person's frailty, or again the caregivers may explain them to you in that way and just pass them off. In fact, many of the signs and symptoms of elder abuse do overlap with symptoms of mental deterioration, but that does not mean that we want to dismiss them on the caregiver's say-so.
Warning Signs
If you suspect abuse but you are not sure, look for the warning signs. We are going to go through these quickly as it relates to each of the types of abuse.
Physical Abuse Warning Signs
- Unexplained signs of injury, such as bruises, welts, or scars
- Broken bones, sprains, or dislocations
- A report of drug overdose or an apparent failure to take medication
- Broken eyeglasses or frames
- Signs of being restrained, such as rope marks on wrists
- Caregiver’s refusal to allow you to see the elder alone
These can include unexplained signs of injury such as bruises, welts, scars, especially if they appear symmetrically on both sides of the body, broken bones, sprains, or dislocations, or fractures that are unexplained. Another warning sign is a report of either a drug overdose or an apparent failure to take their medication. When you go in to do your visit, you may see that there is a lot more of that prescription remaining than should be. They may have broken eyeglasses, broken frames, signs of being restrained, like rope marks on their wrists, or things maybe that came from a zip tie. The caregiver may refuse to allow you to see the elder alone. There can also be signs of burns, internal injuries, and abrasions. These are injuries that are unexplained or somebody is giving you an explanation and that explanation is just really not plausible.
Emotional Abuse Warning Signs
- Threatening, belittling, or controlling caregiver behavior
- Behavior from the elder that mimics dementia
- Depression, sleep and appetite disturbances
- Decreased social contact
- Evasiveness, anxiety, hostility
When we look at emotional abuse warning signs, these are things like threatening, belittling, or controlling caregiver behavior. You may observe the caregiver and what they are saying may not ring true. Your "spidey sense" may be alerted. Behavior from the elder that mimics dementia such as rocking, sucking, or mumbling to themselves. Depression, sleep and appetite disturbances, decreased social contact, loss of interest in their own self, apathy, suicidal ideation, evasiveness, anxiety, hostility, or any of those changes can be potential warning signs. This person who has always wanted to go to activities and been very involved suddenly does not want to go and have isolated themselves would be a big red flag.
Sexual Abuse Warning Signs
- Bruises around breasts or genitals
- Unexplained vaginal or anal bleeding
- Torn, stained, or bloody underclothing
- Fear of being touched
- Inappropriate modesty on evaluation
You may notice some of these things while doing an ADL. Other issues would be unexplained vaginal or anal bleeding, torn, stained, bloody underclothing, fear of being touched, or an inappropriate modesty when you are delivering standard treatment or evaluation. You might have draped that person appropriately, but they still just do not want you to see them.
Neglect Warning Signs
- Unusual weight loss, malnutrition, dehydration
- Untreated physical problems, such as bed sores
- Unsanitary living conditions
- Being left dirty or unbathed
- Unsuitable clothing or covering for the weather
- Unsafe living conditions
- Desertion of the elder at a public place
- Eccentric or idiosyncratic behavior, self-imposed isolation, marked indifference
Elder neglect or even self-neglect have some warning signs. These are things like unusual weight loss without a weight loss program, malnutrition, dehydration, untreated physical problems like bedsores or something else that should be treated, unsanitary living conditions, so dirt, bed bugs, or soiled bedding and clothing. They may be dirty or unbathed, or have unsuitable clothing or covering for the weather. For example, it could be cold outside yet the person has no coat. There may be no heat or running water, faulty electrical wiring, other fire hazards, or maybe they have been deserted at a public place. Another indication is the misuse or the absence of medication or an assistive device. You can also see things like eccentric or idiosyncratic behavior, self-imposed isolation, and a marked indifference to anything that is going on around them. All of those can be signs of neglect.
Financial Exploitation Warning Signs
- Significant withdrawals from the elder’s accounts
- Sudden changes in the elder’s financial condition
- Items or cash missing from the senior’s household
- Suspicious changes in wills, power of attorney, titles, and policies
- Addition of names to the senior’s signature card
- Financial activity the senior couldn’t have undertaken
- Unnecessary services, goods, or subscriptions
- The disparity between assets and appearance and general condition
Some of the warning signs here include significant withdrawals from that person's account, a sudden change in their financial condition, and items or cash missing from their household. Maybe, there have been changes in the will, in the power of attorney, and in titles and policies. They may have signed over these items to someone that just makes you scratch your head. There may be new additions of names to a signature card for the bank or other accounts. There may be financial activity that the person could not have possibly undertaken. For example, an ATM withdrawal when the account holder is bedridden or paying an account online when the person does not even have a computer. There could be unnecessary services, goods, or subscriptions. The client may also display fear, vague answers, or anxiety when asked about their personal finances. You may see a disparity between their assets and their appearance and their general condition.
Healthcare Fraud/Abuse Warning Signs
- Duplicate billings for the same medical service or device
- Evidence of overmedication or under-medication
- Evidence of inadequate care when bills are paid in full
- Problems with the care facility
Duplicate billings for the same medical service or device, evidence of overmedication or under-medication, evidence of inadequate care when the bills are truly paid in full are some warning signs in this category. All of their medical bills are paid, but they do not look like they are cared for. This could also happen in an institution where there are problems with the care facility. The staff could be poorly trained, poorly paid, insufficient staff, or overcrowding.
Risk Factors
- Caregiver stress
- Depression in the caregiver
- Lack of support from other potential caregivers
- Substance abuse by the caregiver
- The intensity of the elderly person’s illness or dementia
- Social isolation
- The elder’s role, at an earlier time, as an abusive parent or spouse
- A history of domestic violence in the home
- The elder’s own tendency toward verbal or physical aggression
Taking care of a senior who has a lot of different care needs can be difficult. Both the demands of caregiving and the needs of that elder can create situations in which abuse is more likely to occur. Many nonprofessional caregivers, spouses, adult children, other relatives, and friends find taking care of an elder to be really satisfying and enriching, but the responsibilities and demands of caregiving can escalate and cause stress as that person's condition deteriorates. The stress of elder care can lead to mental and physical health problems that leave the caregiver burned out, impatient, and more susceptible to neglecting or lashing out at the elder in their care. Even caregivers in institutional settings can experience that stress that can lead to elder abuse. Nursing home staff particularly may be prone to elder abuse if they lack training, have too many responsibilities, are unsuited to caregiving, or they work under poor conditions. In addition to that caregiver's inability to manage stress, some other significant risk factors for elder abuse include depression in the caregiver and lack of support from other caregivers. The caregiver's perception that taking care of the elder is burdensome without any sort of emotional reward is another problem. Other risk factors include substance abuse by the caregiver, the intensity of the elderly person's illness or their dementia, social isolation, meaning that the elder and the caregiver are alone most of the time together, the elder may have been an abusive parent or a spouse, a history of domestic violence in the home, and the elder's own tendency toward verbal or physical aggression.
Federal Reporting Requirements
- Elder Justice Act (EJA): designed to address crimes committed against older persons, raise national awareness of elder justice issues and apply resources to the efforts of those confronting elder abuse and neglect on the front lines in healthcare settings
These reporting requirements come from the Elder Justice Act. The purpose of that act is to detect, prevent, and prosecute elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation. The Elder Justice Act is designed to address crimes committed against older persons, raise national awareness of elder justice issues, and then apply resources to the efforts of those confronting elder abuse and neglect on the front lines in our healthcare settings. The Elder Justice Act as well adds new elder justice provisions and very specific provider requirements particularly in long-term care by amending various sections of several titles of the Social Security Act.
- Section 1150B of the Social Security Act (the Act), as established by section 6703(b)(3) of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (Affordable Care Act), requires specific individuals in applicable long-term care facilities to report any reasonable suspicion of crimes committed against a resident of that facility
- Facilities are required to conspicuously post, in an appropriate location, a notice for its employees specifying the employees’ rights, including the right to file a complaint under this statute. The notice must include a statement that an employee may file a complaint with the SA against an LTC facility that retaliates against an employee.
Section 1150B of the Social Security Act, as established by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, requires that very specific individuals in applicable long-term care facilities report any reasonable suspicion of crimes committed against an individual of that facility. Now, this is required of any facility that receives at least $10,000 in federal funds under the act in the preceding year. That community is required to notify every covered individual of their obligation to report to the Secretary of Health and Human Services, known as the Secretary, and at least one local law enforcement entity, for any reasonable suspicion of a crime. A covered individual, in this case, is an owner, an operator, an employee, a manager, an agent, or a contractor. It includes pretty much everybody. Additionally, communities are required to post in a very conspicuous place a notice for employees specifying their rights including the right to file a complaint, and the notice also has to have a statement in it that an employee can file a complaint with the Secretary and they cannot be retaliated against.
- You have a duty to report any suspected acts involving mistreatment, neglect, abuse, etc.
- Facilities must report any reasonable suspicion of a crime against a resident or patient to:
- The Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and
- The law enforcement authorities in the political subdivision where the facility is located.
You do have a duty to report any suspected acts involving individual mistreatment, neglect, abuse, crimes, misappropriation of resident property, injuries of an unknown source, et cetera. Again, these are healthcare facilities again that are receiving federal aid. These facilities need to report any reasonable suspicion of a crime against an individual or a patient, number one, to the Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, and then also to the law enforcement authorities in the political subdivision where that facility is located. There are two specific federal reporting requirements, and most of these apply to the long-term care segment of the industry as that is where most of our elders reside.
- Two-time limits for the reporting of reasonable suspicion of a crime
- Serious Bodily Injury – 2 Hour Limit
- Shall report the suspicion immediately, but not later than 2 hours after forming the suspicion
- All Others – Within 24 Hours
- If no serious bodily injury shall report the suspicion not later than 24 hours after forming the suspicion
- Serious Bodily Injury – 2 Hour Limit
- “Serious bodily injury” is one involving extreme physical pain or substantial risk of death; or an injury involving protracted loss or impairment of the function of a bodily member, organ, or mental faculty; or an injury requiring medical intervention such as surgery, hospitalization, or physical rehabilitation.
There are two-time limits for reporting reasonable suspicions of crime depending on the seriousness of the event that leads to that suspicion. The first is whether or not there is a serious bodily injury. Now under the Elder Justice Act, serious bodily injury is one involving extreme physical pain, substantial risk of death, or an injury involving protracted loss or impairment of the function of a bodily member, organ, or mental faculty. This is an injury requiring medical intervention such as surgery, hospitalization, or physical rehabilitation. If the events that cause a reasonable suspicion of harm or abuse and there is serious bodily injury, people are required to report immediately but no later than two hours after forming a suspicion to both local law enforcement and the Secretary of Health and Human Services. All others need to be reported within 24 hours. That is federal guidance.
State Reporting Requirements
- Each state may have specific reporting requirements related to abuse
- It is important that you familiarize yourself with the requirements for the state in which you work/provide services
- Report as required by state law
This is where it gets tricky because every state is different. Each state may have specific reporting requirements related to the abuse. And for you, it is important that you familiarize yourself with the requirements for the state where you work and where you provide the services. If you feel or have a reason to believe that somebody is being abused, you need to report this. As every state is different and you need to report as required by your state law.
Resources
- State Adult Protection Statutes:
- State Mandatory reporting Statutes:
Here are a couple of resources. One is the State Adult Protection Statutes, and the second link here is for State Mandatory Reporting Statutes. The second one specifically will tell you where to report, how to report, who is required to report, and what those timeframes are for your specific state. Hopefully, you can take the time to look those up as well.
Child Abuse
Federal Definition of Child Abuse
- Federal Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (CAPTA) (42 U.S.C.A. § 5106g) defines child abuse and neglect as at minimum:
- "Any recent act or failure to act on the part of a parent or caretaker which results in death, serious physical or emotional harm, sexual abuse or exploitation"; or
- "An act or failure to act which presents an imminent risk of serious harm."
According to the United States Department of Health and Human Services, federal legislation provides guidance to states by identifying a minimum set of acts or behaviors that define child abuse and neglect. The Federal Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act or CAPTA, as amended by a Reauthorization Act in 2010, defines child abuse and neglect at a minimum to any recent act or failure to act on the part of a parent or caretaker which results in death, serious physical or emotional harm, sexual abuse or exploitation, and an act or failure to which presents an immediate or an imminent risk of serious harm.
Definitions
- A "child" generally means a person who is younger than age 18 or who is not an emancipated minor
- CAPTA does not provide specific definitions for types of maltreatment such as physical abuse, neglect, or emotional abuse
- Federal legislation sets minimum standards for States that accept CAPTA funding, each state provides its own definitions of maltreatment within civil and criminal statutes
Under these definitions, this definition refers very specifically to parents and other caregivers. A child under this definition generally means a person who is younger than the age of 18 or who is not an emancipated minor. And while CAPTA provides definitions for sexual abuse and the special cases of neglect related to withholding or failing to provide medically indicated treatment, it does not provide specific definitions for other types of maltreatment or things like physical abuse, neglect, or emotional abuse. While federal legislation sets those minimum standards for states that accept CAPTA funding, each state is going to go out on its own and provide its own definitions of maltreatment within civil and criminal statutes.
State Statutes
- Definitions of child abuse and neglect are typically located in two places within each State's statutory code:
- Civil statutes provide definitions of child maltreatment for mandated reporters
- Criminal statutes define those forms of child maltreatment subject to arrest and prosecution
The federal definition is out there, but the state has to be accepting CAPTA funding for that federal definition to apply. More often than not, each state is going to have its own set of statutes related to child abuse. We will talk about this on another slide, but that is again where it is up to you to figure out the requirements in your specific state. Are you a mandatory reporter? What are your training requirements? I gave you some resources to do that, and we will talk about that in a minute. The definitions of child abuse are going to be located typically in two places within each state's statutory code. The first statutory code will be the civil statutes, and these will provide those definitions of what is child maltreatment. It also will help to guide the mandatory reporters and other individuals as well as to identify and report suspected child abuse and determine the grounds for intervention by the state child protection agencies and the civil courts. This is the overarching area of what is abuse, who reports, how do you report, and what do we do when you report. The criminal statutes, on the other hand, will define those forms of child maltreatment that can subject an offender to arrest and prosecution in criminal courts. Most of them will list out very specifically the types of things that are absolutely positively against the law and what would warrant an arrest, prosecution, jail time, community service, or whatever it would happen to be.
Types of Abuse
- Many states recognize four major types of maltreatment
- Neglect
- Physical abuse
- Sexual abuse
- Emotional abuse or neglect
Many states recognize four major types of maltreatment in their definitions and these include neglect, physical abuse, sexual abuse, and emotional abuse or neglect. Let's look at these in a little more detail. I think the first step in helping an abused or neglected child is learning those warning signs. The presence of a single sign does not prove that child abuse is occurring but it could be. But, when you look at the situation a little bit more closely, you may see signs appear repeatedly or in combination. When you see a pattern, that is when you want to take notice. If you do suspect at any time that a child is being harmed, you have to report your suspicions because that is going to help protect that child and get some help for the family. We will talk about reporting in a second, but any person can report suspicions of child abuse and neglect. Mandatory reporters need to report under very specific circumstances defined by the state. Healthcare providers with very few exceptions would be considered mandatory reporters in those states.
Recognizing Child Abuse
- The Child:
- Shows sudden changes in behavior or school performance
- Has not received help for physical or medical problems
- Has learning problems that cannot be attributed to specific causes
- Is always watchful
- Lacks adult supervision
- Is overly compliant, passive, or withdrawn
- Comes to school or other activities early, stays late, and does not want to go home
These are the signs in a child that may signal child abuse or neglect. They show sudden changes in behavior or school performance. They were a wonderful student and now they are not. They have not received help for a physical or a medical problem that has been brought to the parent's attention. They have learning problems or difficulty concentrating in the classroom that cannot be attributed to a very specific physical or psychological cause. Or, maybe that child is always watchful as though they are always preparing for something bad to happen. They are looking for that other shoe to drop or looking over their shoulder. They lack adult supervision when they are not of an age to be unsupervised. They are overly compliant or very passive or withdrawn. They say yes ma'am or no sir to all requests. They come to school or to other activities early, they stay late, and they do not really want to go home when it is time for dismissal.
- The Parent:
- Shows little concern for the child
- Denies the existence of—or blames the child for—the child’s problems in school or at home
- Asks teachers to use harsh physical discipline
- Sees the child as entirely bad, worthless, or burdensome
- Demands a level of physical or academic performance the child cannot achieve
- Looks primarily to the child for care, attention, and satisfaction of emotional needs
This parent shows little concern for the child. They pass off some of the things that are happening with their child as not being important. They deny the existence of or even blame the child for the child's own problems in school or at home. They ask a teacher or a caregiver to use harsh physical discipline if that child misbehaves. It is okay to do X, Y, and Z if the child misbehaves. "This is what we do at home." They see the child as bad, worthless, or burdensome. They demand a level of physical or academic performance that the child cannot possibly achieve. This is different from encouraging them to be a better student or athlete. This is forcing something that they could not possibly achieve or do not have the physical or mental capacity to do. They look at the child primarily for care, attention, and satisfaction of their own emotional needs rather than providing the care to the child for the child's needs.
- The Parent and Child:
- Rarely touch or look at each other
- Consider their relationship entirely negative
- State that they do not like each other
We can also look at the parent and child dyad together. They rarely touch each other or look at each other. You do not see that bond or connection between the two of them. They consider their relationship entirely negative, and they may just flat out state that they do not like each other and truly mean that. We talked about the types of maltreatment that are generally defined in the state statute, and now, we are going to go through now some of the signs that are associated with the types of child abuse and neglect. It is important to note however that these types of abuse are typically found in combination rather than alone.
You will not typically just see physical abuse without also some sort of emotional or mental anguish as well. For example, a child who is sexually abused may also be neglected. You want to look for these in combination and look for some of those signs. And again, a lot of these are going to be very similar to what we just talked about with elder abuse.
Physical Abuse
- Has unexplained burns, bites, bruises, broken bones, or black eyes
- Has fading bruises or other marks noticeable after an absence from school
- Seems frightened of the parents and protests or cries when it is time to go home
- Shrinks at the approach of adults
- Reports injury by a parent or another adult caregiver
They may have unexplained burns, bites, bruises, broken bones, and black eyes. They may be consistently in the emergency room for some sort of treatment. They have fading bruises or other marks that are noticeable after an absence from school. They seem frightened of the parents. They protest or they cry when it is time to go home. They shrink at the approach of an adult and are wary of adults who are around them. They report injuries by a parent or another adult caregiver, or they report an injury and the explanation of that injury is just not plausible. The proverbial "I fell down the stairs" type of excuse.
- Consider physical abuse when the adult:
- Offers conflicting, unconvincing, or no explanation for the child’s injury
- Describes the child as “evil,” or in some other very negative way
- Uses harsh physical discipline with the child
- Has a history of abuse as a child
We might want to consider physical abuse if they are offering conflicting, unconvincing, or no explanation for the child's injury. "have no idea how that happened." Or, "Don't worry about it. It's no big deal." They describe the child as evil in some way, or they are very negative in their description of the child. They use harsh physical discipline with the child even when it is not warranted. Another one is that they themselves may have a history of abuse as a child.
Neglect
- The child is frequently absent from school
- Begs or steals food or money
- Lacks needed medical or dental care
- Is consistently dirty
- Lacks sufficient clothing for the weather
- Abuses alcohol/drugs
- States that there is no one at home to provide care
You want to consider the possibility of neglect when the child is frequently absent from school again without a reason. This is when they are not on vacation, not sick and at the physician, and not visiting their grandparents. They may beg or steal food in the cafeteria. They may lack the necessary medical or dental care that they should be having at their age. They may not have their immunizations not necessarily related to the opinions of the parent but because the parent refuses to give them. Maybe they need glasses, but they do not have glasses. They are consistently dirty and do not look well-kept. They have severe body odor or their hair is very dirty. They may have consistent issues with lice or other types of bugs. They may lack sufficient clothing for the weather, again very similar to elder abuse. It is cold outside but they do not have a coat. It is raining but they do not have anything to protect them from the elements. The child may be abusing alcohol, drugs, or other things more consistent in an older child. They may state that there is no one home to provide care for them. They may say, "I cook my own meals all the time." Another clue is, "I take care of a younger sibling."
- Consider neglect when the adult:
- Appears to be indifferent to the child
- Seems apathetic or depressed
- Behaves irrationally or in a bizarre manner
- Is abusing alcohol or other drugs
You also want to consider the possibility of neglect again when we look at the parent or the adult caregiver and they are indifferent to that child. They are apathetic and do not seem to care. They themselves are depressed and not in a position to care appropriately for that child. They behave irrationally or in a bizarre type of manner. Or, they may be abusing alcohol or other drugs themselves.
Sexual Child Abuse
- Has difficulty walking or sitting
- Suddenly refuses to change for gym
- Reports nightmares or bedwetting
- Experiences a sudden change in appetite
- Demonstrates bizarre, sophisticated, or unusual sexual knowledge
- Becomes pregnant or contracts a venereal disease
- Runs away
- Reports sexual abuse by a parent or another adult caregiver
Consider the possibility of sexual child abuse when that child has difficulty walking or sitting. You see that they have pain in their genital area. It is observable that they are very uncomfortable. They suddenly refuse to change for the gym, participate in physical activities, or maybe participate in your treatment session. They may report having nightmares or bedwetting. Their appetite may have gone down or up, and they may also have sleep disturbances. They have bizarre, sophisticated, or even unusual sexual knowledge or behavior for their age. Things that they should not know but they do. They may become pregnant or have a sexually transmitted infection, particularly at younger ages. They run away or they report some sort of sexual abuse by a parent or another adult or caregiver. You have to take these comments very seriously.
- Consider sexual abuse when the adult:
- Is unduly protective of the child or severely limits the child’s contact with other children, especially of the opposite sex
- Is secretive and isolated
- Is jealous or controlling with family members
We also want to consider the possibility of sexual abuse when the parent, adult caregiver, or older sibling is really protective of that child. This severely limits the child's contact with other children or other individuals, especially of the opposite sex. They are secretive and isolated. They look like they have an unhealthy type of family bond. They are very jealous and controlling with other family members.
Emotional Maltreatment
- Shows extremes in behavior
- Is either inappropriately adult or inappropriately infantile
- Is delayed in physical or emotional development
- Has attempted suicide
- Reports a lack of attachment to the parent
Signs of emotional maltreatment is when you see a child showing extremes in behavior. They may be overly demanding, extremely passive, or extremely aggressive. They are either inappropriately adult-like or infantile as examples. They may be delayed in their physical, emotional development, and cognitive development. Perhaps, they have attempted suicide or have even talked about suicide. They feel like their life is not worthy or unsatisfactory. They may report a lack of attachment to the parent. If we interact with that parent or caregiver, we may see that the adult constantly blames, belittles, or berates that child. They are really unconcerned about the child, their whereabouts, their well-being, and those sorts of things. They do not consider the offers of help for the child's problem.
How to Report Suspicions
- Suspected Child Maltreatment
- If in serious danger, call 911
- National and local resources are available to provide assistance and information about reporting suspected maltreatment.
- Suspected child abuse or neglect?
- Contact your local child protective services office or law enforcement agency
- Know the statutes if you are a mandatory reporter
If you see suspicions, what do you do? If you or someone else is in immediate danger, call 911. That is the best thing to do because there are both national and local resources that are available to provide immediate assistance to that child and family. You would want to report that information about suspected maltreatment. Again this is very state-specific, but at a bare minimum, you would contact your local Child Protective Services office or law enforcement agency. If you are a mandatory reporter in your state, you are going to need to know what their requirements are. I can tell you that I am licensed in a couple of states, and I look at my licensing requirements. There are very specific rules that you need to follow about timeframes, phone calls, and specific people to contact. Unfortunately, in the scope of this presentation, we cannot go into that level of detail, but you need to know what the statutes are for your specific state.
Who Can Report?
- Anyone can report suspected child abuse or neglect
- All U.S. States and territories have laws identifying mandatory reporters
- Mandatory reporters may include social workers, teachers, and other school personnel, childcare providers, physicians, and other health-care workers, mental health professionals, and law enforcement officers
Again all states have laws that identify persons who are mandatory reporters like social workers, teachers, school personnel, childcare providers, physicians, mental health professionals, and law enforcement officers. They are all identified in those state statutes, However, any person who suspects child abuse and neglect can and should report.
What Happens Next?
- Report a complete, honest account of what you observed that led you to your suspicion. Any reasonable suspicion is sufficient.
- Reports are sent to child protective services (CPS) for review
- If an investigation is deemed needed, CPS may talk with the family, the child, or others to help determine what is making the child unsafe
- For more information about where and how to file a report, contact your local child protective services agency or police department
You need to provide a completely honest account of what you observed that led you to suspect the occurrence of child abuse or neglect and any reasonable suspicion is sufficient. Do not make up details or leave out details - be clear, be honest about what you saw, what you heard, or what you observed. Do not base that on hearsay. It should only be based on your own report. This report is going to be sent over to Child Protective Services or CPS for review. Generally speaking, again for states, when they receive that report, the worker will review the information and determine if an investigation is necessary. That CPS worker may talk to the family, the child, or other individuals to help determine what possibly is making this child unsafe. They can also help parents and other caregivers get services, get an education, and get other assistance to help them through the situation.
Resources
- Childhelp National Child Abuse
- Call or text 1.800.4.A.CHILD (1.800.422.4453). Professional crisis counselors are available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, in over 170 languages.
- National Center for Missing and Exploited Children’s CyberTipline
- Report online sexual exploitation of a child or if you suspect that a child has been inappropriately contacted online at the CyberTipline.
There are national resources that are available. For the Childhelp National Child Abuse resource, there are professional crisis counselors there 24 hours a day, seven days a week available in 170 different languages. Every call that is placed is completely confidential, and the hotline offers things like crisis intervention, information, referrals out to other emergency services, social services, and other sorts of resources that are available in the community. There is also the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children's Cyber. This is an online reporting if you suspect any sort of sexual exploitation of a child, and that would include human trafficking. You can also report if you suspect that a child has been inappropriately contacted online. Information again is made available to law enforcement in order to conduct that investigation.
- State Statutes for Child Protective Services:
- State reporting Phone Numbers:
Here are two resources for your states. The first one is the state statutes for Child Protective Services, and the second is the state reporting phone numbers. Now, these are not necessarily the end all be all. Again go back to your Practice Act, your licensure, etc. But, these are some good starting points so that you can start to read about what is required.
Citation
Weissberg, K. (2019). Elder abuse and child abuse: Know the signs and your role. Continued - Counseling, Article 20. Available at www.continued.com/counseling
Oct 29, 2026